Ethics Munson’s 5 Ethical Theories Essay

morals is a offset if philosophy that deal with ideas ab prohibited what is mor ally good and bad. Ethics act as tools, giving us pleader when we hold to keep back important decisions in soul-to- psyche and professional situations. at that place argon biblical inferences that can relate to approximately if non all situations that we come across in our daily lives. deity will not put us in roughly(prenominal) situations that we cannot be triumphant in. If the rule book is an compulsory in all of these theories, so is savior the Nazarene. The setoff honourable possible action is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the ethical conjecture that describes how the moral survey or worth of an action is determined by how much acquire is gained from that action. It is mea certain(a)d by not only the descend of usefulness gained but also the amount of citizenry with wins in the process. This surmise hopes to provide guidance when choosing a course of action. Utilita rianism is divided into dickens groups based off of how they apply the theory. A Rule Utilitarian believes that the action is slump if it results in happiness of great benefit (Munson, 2009). For example, the commandment, thou shall not use up is precise straight forward and doesnt entrust room for interpretation. Someone who follows Rule Utilitarianism would strictly follow this rule by neer committing murder or killing each living creature.An motion Utilitarian would describe the commandment according to its greatest benefit. Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action is just if it is let on than all of the other(a) options as gigantic as it presents the surpass results. In other words, in that respect may be situations in which breaking the rules may be the beaver option. Breaking the commandment, thou shall not kill may seem wrong when face at it from the surface, but if it is done to uphold the lifes of others it may yield the best result. The absolute that applies to Utilitarianism is the news. 2 Corinthians 97 says, Each one mustiness give as he has pertinacious in his heart not reluctantly or under compulsion, for theology wonders a cheerful giver. This theory is about the best benefit and focuses on the amount of benefit as well as the amount of people it benefits. In order to fulfil this, the agent for giving cannot be selfishly or self- motivated. Immanuel Kants deontological theory is the on the whole opposite of Utilitarianism. Kantian Ethics believes that right and wrong ar not depended on their consequences but on whether the vocation or task at hand is fulfilled.Kant theory is also reliant on the see that valets, unlike whatsoeverother creature, gain the capacity to rationalize. He believes that a persons noticeings and inclinations should not play all(prenominal) part in motivating a chosen action. This theory does not break down well in the subject bea of health business concern. Feelings and in clinations ar a necessity when working with human beings. Healthcare workers are not recitation step by step book of instructions as if they are putting a car together, but instead are caring for a patient whose solecism is different and patient specific. Patients cannot be tough like a checklist. Although this theory eliminated any of the categories under the Bible commandments, guidelines, inferences, and convictions completion is a big topic in the Bible. God completed the creation of the world in six days, and rested on the seventh. savior Christ rose from the dead on the third day. In John 174, Jesus said to them, My food is to do the will of Him who sent Me and to accomplish His work. W.D. Ross believed that there was not one rule or principle that one must tarry by. Instead he believed that we can occur through moral duties. Ross proposed that we have self-evident prima facie moral duties and that there are some things have intrinsic value (Ross, 2002).He believed we have the transaction of fidelity or the duty to keep our promises, the duty of reparation or the duty to reach for stultification done to others, the duty of gratitude or the duty to return favors, the duty of munificence or the duty to maximize the good, and the duty of non- combat injury or the duty to refuse harm to others (Ross, 2002). For example, it is generally wrong to kill a person because it causes pain and is one of the 10 commandments. In order for it not to be wrong to kill, a person must have an overriding reason to do it such as saving the lives of others. Rosss belief in overriding reason is very similar to that Act Utilitarianism. The Bible is an absolute in this theory as well. Ross puts emphasis on the duties we must uphold. The Bible lays out umpteen an(prenominal) duties given to Christians. iodin of the most popular lists is the Ten Commandments. sexual abstention Ethics is the approach that deemphasizes rules and duty, focusing on a persons source ( Munson, 2009). Character is an important focus when choosing employees in the Healthcare line. I have worked in many healthcare areas and have worked with many people who truly were not in the field for the right reasons. Passion is a necessity when working with human beings. There are many workers who lack this typical and are simply in the field for monetary benefit.Although it may be out(predicate) to completely rid thehealthcare field of bad seeds, providing an overflow of kindhearted, loving employees would emphatically help. The Bible is an absolute in this ethical approach. Matthew 1235 says, The good person out of his good treasure set out forth good, and the evil person out of his evil treasure brings forth evil. As a Christian we must make sure we are living our lives in Gods image. We are base on balls billboards for Christ and need to make sure that we act accordingly. As a Christian, this walking will definitely be baffling and there will be many temptations alon g the way but our feature will help us to involve the right path. Care Ethics argues that some duties cannot be justified by theories of right, justice, and return (Velasquez, 2002). Care ethics believe that the most important factor is the concrete family with a person or persons (Velasquez, 2002). This theory is very evident in the healthcare field and I square off this theory most appealing. I have worked in the healthcare field for most of my rush and assimilate that it is my duty to take care of and provide for each patient I serve.Through experience, I also realize that there are certain patients that I have been drawn to, and that I feel closer to. At my last job, I worked on the spinal cord injury unit. Most of my patients were fully depended on what I did for them. The interaction could be awkward as I was performing tasks such as showers, bowel programs, and diaper changes. I matte up it my duty to make them feel homely and to let them know that I care. For a lot of my patients, I was the only family they had. No one ever came to visit them so our conversation was something to look forward to. As I worked with a patient every day, special bonds were formed. We celebrated any and all progress made. Whether it is something as small as moving a pinky for the first time or taking a first step after, everything should be celebrated. twain Jesus Christ and the Bible are absolutes in this theory.This job has also taught me to be more appreciative of the things I do have. It has taught me to stop complaining about elflike things. Most of my patients lived regular lives just as I do, and in an instance it was interpreted away from them. Most people unknowingly take things for granted such as being able to walk, talk, brush your teeth, and equip yourself. Instead, we feel that the things are owed to us and that we are deserving of these things. The Bible and Jesus Christ are definitely absolutes in this theory. We as Christians yearn for a strong, deeper relationship with God and the best way to attain this is bystudying the word of God daily. Proverbs 817 says, I Love those who love me And those who diligently seek me will find me.ReferencesHoly BibleKant, I. (1785) First persona Transition from the Common Rational fellowship of Morals to the Philosophical. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Munson, R. (2009). Intervention and reproof Basic issues of bioethics (9th ed.). Ross, W.D., (2002). The Right and the Good. Edited, with an Introduction, by Philip Stratton- Lake. wise York Oxford University Press rpt. of original 1930 edition. Velasquez, M.G., (2002). Business Ethics Concepts and Cases. Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall.